Integrating Balanced Scorecard (BSC) With Compensation Strategies

The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is a tool utilized in corporations for the purpose of compensating workers in a way that is beneficial for both the management and the workforce. The Balanced Scorecard technique aids assessment of corporation performance in terms of monetary and non-monetary aspects. Connecting compensation to the Balanced Scorecard is useful because it acts as an equitable way of evaluating performance of companies by utilizing similar standards. The connection between company profitability and the amount of reward motivates employees to improve their performance. Realization of company’s goals is possible with the implementation of Balanced Scorecard and compensation. Usually, achievement of the goals and objectives of the company depends on the productivity of workers. Utilization of the Balanced Scorecard motivates workers to improve their performance and in turn achieve rewards. The linkage between the Balanced Scorecard and compensation operates well within the organization which possesses established quality programs. Assimilation Continue reading

360 Degree Feedback – Meaning, Process, Pros and Cons

360 degree feedback is an assessment evaluation tool that is focused on employee job performance from a multisource perspective. It is also referred as a multisource assessment or a multi-rater feedback since it relies on information from various actors. Ideally a 360 degree feedback assessment is done by evaluating an employee job performance through a comprehensive investigation of their working relationship, from both an internal and external perspective. The idea is to generate an accurate assessment of an employee job skills, quality of work output and team work abilities that can be relied for employee assessment and job evaluation. The term “360 degree feedback” was introduced in the 1990-s as systematic collection of information on the results of an individual or a group obtained from the environment. It is intended to obtain an informative feedback from the manager, subordinates, peers and management.  In some cases there may be used a Continue reading

360 Degree Performance Evaluation – Meaning, Process, Advantages and Disadvantages

Meaning and Process of 360 Degree Performance Evaluation Performance evaluations are an official interaction between managers and employees in which the manager assesses job performance and discusses in detail strengths, weaknesses and opportunities for development of the employee. Performance reviews serve as an important part of a human resource management systems. Measuring job performance, developing leadership skills, and designing a career path are the major uses of performance appraisal. Ideally, management conducts appraisals in an objective, consistent, and fair way. There are different forms of appraisals that organizations may choose to employ, including, 360 degree performance evaluation, management by objectives and a rating scale. A 360 degree performance evaluation (sometimes referred to as 360-degree feedback), utilizes input from oneself, colleagues, subordinates, and customers, as well as managerial feedback to complete the appraisal of job performance. The philosophy behind gaining feedback from a self-assessment and a variety of additional sources is Continue reading

Data Security and Employee Confidentiality in HRIS Systems

HR data are typically confidential and sensitive. Consequently, a key concern with Human Resources Information System (HRIS) is the potential for the invasion (and abuse) of employee privacy by both authorized and unauthorized personnel.  It is important for ensuring employee and management confidence in a HRIS to thoroughly explore questions about user access, data accuracy, data disclosure, employee rights of inspection and security. Failure to do so may result in ethical, legal and employee relations problems of a magnitude which could destroy the credibility of the system. ‘Establishing security and end user privileges’, says O’Connell, ‘calls for a balance of incorporating HR policy, system knowledge and day to day operations.’ The Human Resources Information System security checklist is: Review all PC-based HR applications. Verify that all users are properly trained in the secure use and handling of equipment, data and software. Ensure that all users sign-off (log-off) before they leave Continue reading

Purposes of Performance Management System

Performance Management is often a misunderstood concept most people associate it with concepts such as: Performance appraisal, Performance-related pay, Targets and objectives, Motivation and discipline. But, performance management is much more than this. Performance management is about getting results. It is concerned with getting the best from people and helping them to achieve their potential. It is an approach to achieving a shared vision of the purpose and aims of the organization. It is concerned with helping individuals and teams achieve their potential and recognize their role in contributing to the goals of the organization. A performance management system consists of the processes used to identify, encourage, measure, evaluate, improve, and reward employee performance at work. Employees’ job performance is an important issue for all employers. However, satisfactory performance does not happen automatically; therefore, it is more likely with a good performance management system. A performance management system serves a Continue reading

Equity and Fairness of Employee Compensation Systems

Compensation is key to organisational strategy. It has an impact on attracting and retaining employees and ensuring optimal performance in meeting the organisation’s objectives. The economic importance of compensation is that it should allow the organization to maintain a cost structure that enables it to compete effectively and efficiently in its markets. Adams equity theory suggests that once an individual has chosen an action that is expected to satisfy his or her needs, the individual assesses the equity or fairness of the outcome. Three attitudes are possible; an individual may feel equitably rewarded, under rewarded, or over rewarded. When individuals feel under rewarded or over rewarded, they will do something to reduce the inequity. A further development ‘Fairness theory’ takes into account the notion of accountability and blame. When people identify an instance of unfair treatment, they are holding someone accountable for an action that threatens another person’s material or Continue reading