In order to explore the link between core competency and competitive advantage, it is crucial to understand the implications of both terms. Competitive advantage could imply exploitation of resources resulting in an organisation’s distinctive position compared to competition. While most firms view the attainment of competitive advantage as earning greater investment returns, it can comprise of various aspects, for instance, enhancing environmental impact or capturing a greater market share can be viewed as a source of competitive advantage for a particular firm. Porter (1985) defined competitive advantage as the value delivered by a firm’s products that exceeds costs of creating that value. In this context, competitive advantage was achieved by a firm through adoption of either a differentiation or cost leadership strategy. However, competitive advantage does not solely rely upon implementation of value creating activities as the notion undermines and sometimes ignores to account for the potential of competitors. Therefore Continue reading
Strategic Management Terms
McKinsey’s Three Horizons Framework
Mehrdad Baghai, Stephen Coley and David White in their book “The Alchemy of Growth” define the three horizons for growth. The book was based on a study of 40 growth companies, where the authors tried to identify how these successful companies approach and implement growth strategies. The key pattern that the authors identified is one of a step-by-step approach, a “staircase of initiatives.” Companies certainly keep an eye on the longer term strategy, but also simultaneously manage the near term. Each time a short term target is reached, a new capability is developed, a small acquisition is integrated, successful growers look at this as a platform for the next step. This may be a platform to continue to execute towards a strategic goal that had been set in the past. But it may also be a stage where new opportunities arise, that the company may not have been aware of Continue reading
Scenario Planning as a Strategic Management Tool
Formal scenario planning emerged during the Second World War, when it was used as a part of military strategy as countries prepared themselves for different contingencies. Since then, the use of scenario planning has become increasingly popular. Scenarios are tools for ordering one’s perception about alternative future environment in which today’s decision might be framed. In practice, scenarios resemble a set of stories, written or spoken, built around carefully constructed plots. These stories can express multiple perspectives on complex events, scenarios give meaning to these events. Scenarios are powerful planning tools precisely because the future is unpredictable. Unlike traditional forecasting or market research, scenarios present alternative images instead of extrapolating current trends from the present. Scenarios also embrace qualitative perspectives and the potential for sharp discontinuities that econometric models exclude. Consequently, creating scenarios requires decision-makers to question their broadest assumptions about the way the world works so that they can Continue reading
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG): A Tool for Goal Setting
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) is the term coined by James C Collins and Jerry I Porras in their well known book “Built To Last”. Visionary Companies set Big Hairy Audacious Goals (BHAGs) that raise the bar and inspire people across all levels. According to Collins and Porras: “A true BHAG is clear and compelling, serves as a unifying focal point of effort…It has a clear finish line, so the organization can know when it has achieved the goal. It is tangible, energizing, highly focused. People get it right away; it takes little or no explanation.” BHAG is a goal, not a statement and it has a clear finish line. It’s a highly focused, tangible, and energizing goal. They typically take a 10- to 30-year commitment, but they are exciting, tangible and something everyone just “gets” without any further explanation. BHAGs only help an organization as long as it has Continue reading
Organizational Performance – Meaning, Definition and Measures
Managers are concerned with organizational performance–the accumulated end results of all the organization’s work processes and activities. It’s a complex but important concept, and managers need to understand the factors that contribute to high organizational performance. After all, they don’t want (or intend) to manage their way to mediocre performance. They want their organizations, work units, or work groups to achieve high levels of performance, no matter what mission, strategies, or goals are being pursued. Managers measure and control organizational performance because it leads to better asset management, to an increased ability to provide customer value, and to improved measures of organizational knowledge. In addition, measures of organizational performance do have an impact on an organization’s reputation. Managers at high-performing companies do–they manage the organizational assets in ways that exploit their value. Asset management is the process of acquiring, managing, renewing, and disposing of assets as needed, and of designing Continue reading
Alignment – A Strategic Management Concept By Kaplan & Norton
Alignment is a key factor in effective implementation of strategy. Most large organizations are divided into business units which are out of sync and work at cross purposes. The challenge is to coordinate the activities of these units and leverage their skills for the benefit of the organization as a whole. Kaplan & Norton call this alignment on their book “Alignment: Using the Balanced Scorecard to Create Corporate Synergies.” “Most organizations attempt to create synergy, but in a fragmented, uncoordinated way,” Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton. By aligning the activities of its various business and support units, an organization can create additional sources of value in various ways. Financial synergies can be generated through centralized resource allocation and financial management. Value can also be created if corporate headquarters can operate internal capital markets better than external market mechanisms and share knowledge across business units, in a manner that Continue reading